The BBC noted today, July 24, that “US judge overturns Cuba book ban”.
The Miami-Dade Student Government Association and the ACLU said removing the book was violated students’ constitutional right of access to information under the First Amendment.
“By totally banning the Cuba books and the rest of the series, the school board is in fact prohibiting even the voluntary consideration of the themes contained in the books by students at their leisure,” said Judge Gold.

America and Florida are again leading seeing the results of those who would deny access to knowledge to those who voluntarily seek. In this case it is political rather than religious and the complainant, Juan Amador Rodriguez, may have good reason to feel strongly about the Castro government. He does not want his primary school daughter to read anything positive about the country where he was a political prisoner. The desire to protect her is valid enough for a parent. However, he also fled this totalitarian regime to enter into the freedoms that the American Constitution guarantees. That means his daughter does not have to read the book, Vamos A Cuba. It does not mean that his complaint nor the support of a strong member of the Miami-Dade County School System, Frank Bolaños , can keep other children from this book nor from the entire series of childrens’ books that had been banned.
The entire, lengthy legal opinion of the United States Southern District Court, Southern District of Florida in the case of the American Civil Liberties Union of Florida v. Miami Dade County School Board is available as a pdf document for download.

The Miami Herald which has been reporting on this issue published an article by Ani Martinez on 14 July titled “VAMOS A CUBA Book’s foe sensitive to tyranny” where she describes the Cuban exile’s third grader’s interest in her father’s homeland.
Ten-year-old Yilen Amador Rodriguez couldn’t wait for bedtime so she could show her dad a book about Cuba that she had brought home from school.
The third-grader had often heard her father talk about his homeland at the dinner table. But she was surprised when he began to thumb through Vamos a Cuba, which Yilen had checked out last spring from the library at Marjory Stoneman Douglas Elementary School in West Miami-Dade County.
His smile quickly faded when the former political prisoner saw pictures of children dressed in communist school uniforms.
”When you are 5 years old in Cuba, you denounce your family and belong to the state,” explained the father, Juan Amador Rodriguez, who formally complained about the book in April and got it banned by the Miami-Dade School Board on June 14.
He has his right to request a time-out from freedom. Amazingly (except that it is Florida) the school board went along with him and banned this book and a whole series of books about children living in other societies.
Rodriquez was jailed in Cuba for over four years when he was 18 for denouncing the Castro government. When he was released he went to work building a raft. In 1995 he, his wife and his brothers embarked on the raft and made it to Miami where the little girl, Yilen, was born. He now owns a number of lunch trucks that sell to construction workers in the Doral area of Miami.
The blog, “Miami Gradebook: Inside South Florida Education” by the education writer for the Miami Herald who is writing about the case, Matthew I. Pinzur, says
It’s a pretty decisive win for the ACLU. The question now is whether Frank Bolaños can convince the majority of the board to appeal the injunction and push forward on the case, or whether the majority of the board reads Judge Gold’s decision and decides to cut bait.
Mr. Rodriquez undoubtedly has reason for a strong distaste for anything that seems to support a totalitarian regime from which he fled. However, the banning and burning of books whether for children or anyone else who can or can hope to learn to read is anathema to the freedoms of the country to which he fled. Florida has a terrible history of repressiveness and racism, bigotry and religious intolerance. This decision seems to buck that tradition as it protects the society as a whole from the desires of a few to limit access to information.
MORE on Blogcritics >>>>>>>>
books
News and politics