Metropolitan Museum of Art


The Met has the most beautiful and accessible web-site. It continues to take me by storm. The Met, MOMA, galleries up and downtown, the quiet of the Frick, the caracol of the Guggenheim and the Whitney with its’slate floors and good restaurant all make me nostalgic for home and for the City. Sadly, my inability to fly commercially probably means I won’t be there again. The magic of the ‘Net helps.

The non-camera photograph is by William Fox Talbot in 1839 as photography appeared. The Met describes it,

This evanescent trace of a biological specimen, among the rarest of photographs, was made by William Henry Fox Talbot just months after he first presented his invention, photography—or “photogenic drawing,” as he called it—to the public. Talbot’s earliest images were made without a camera; here a piece of slightly translucent seaweed was laid directly onto a sheet of photosensitized paper, blocking the rays of the sun from the portions it covered and leaving a light impression of its form.

Plants were often the subject of Talbot’s early photographs, for he was a serious amateur botanist and envisioned the accurate recording of specimens as an important application of his invention. The “Album di disegni fotogenici,” in which this print appears, contains thirty-six images sent by Talbot to the Italian botanist Antonio Bertoloni in 1839–40. It was the first important photographic work purchased by the Metropolitan Museum.

More shows are listed as well as the permanent collection and a way to collect images of the works to study over and over.

Mexican Journalist Honored

The blog, The Latin Americanist, which is one of my favorites for news of the region, has noted recently that the Mexican journalist, Elena Poniatowska, was one of four female journalists given the Courage in Journalism award by the International Women’s Media Foundation.

Crab Nebula


AOPD had a fantastic picture of M1, the Crab Nebula, yesterday. It was shot in optical, x-ray and infra-red by Hubble, Spitzer and Chandra telescopes. The copyright is by NASA.

Visit Astronomical Picture of the Day daily. It is a cheery view of the universe. It is also, amazingly, one that came from the sight/vision/soul of Van Gogh. He saw through to the nature of the universe, it would seem.


News: Ohio Scientists Join To Support School Board Candidate

The recent post on the Charles Darwin manuscript site and the teaching of evolutionary science was sadly prophetic. Today the New York Times reported on scientists in Ohio banding together to protect science teaching in the state from yet another on-slaught of an “intelligent design” candidate for the Board of Education. Here is a draft of my article for Blogcritics:

“The
New York Times
reported today on an unusual development in an Ohio election where 75 professors from Case Western Reserve University entered the political arena by endorsing (honest) Tom Sawyer, a candidate for the Ohio Board of Education. Mr. Sawyer is a former mayor of Akron and Congressman.

The scientists were moved to their action in the hope of defeating Deborah Owens Fink, “a leading advocate of curriculum standards that encourage students to challenge the theory of evolution.” Ohio professors are acting thoughout the state to fight for candidates who support the teaching of science without religious censorship. Physics professor Lawrence M. Krauss was the organizer of the letter and reported that nearly 90% of the Case Western science faculty had joined in the signing. They included physicists, chemists, biologists, geologists and, it was said, psychologists.

When interviewed by the Times Dr. Krauss said “This is not some group of fringe scientists or however they are being portrayed by the creationist community. This is the entire scientific community, and I don’t know of any other precedent for almost the entire faculty at an institution” joining in this kind of concerted, political effort. Dr. Owens Fink, the other candidate, is a Professor of Marketing at the University of Akron and a registered Republican.

Even back in July the Ohio School Board debated guidelines to control the teaching not just of evolutionary science but other “controversial” subjects such as cloning and global warming. The Americans United For The Separation Of Church And State sent a plea from their Executive Director, Reverend Barry W. Lynn,

Public school students in Ohio deserve sound science education, not religious dogma masquerading as science. It’s time for Religious Right allies on the board to drop their unwise agenda and focus on policies that will benefit all of Ohio’s students.

This type of local and state school board debate is current news but the freedom of the academic community to teach the natural sciences without interference from some religious groups is a continuing, deep division somewhat unique to the United States. In the rest of the industrialized world it is, as The New Scientist published an reported in “Why Doesn’t America Believe In Evolution?” in the August 20 on-line issue, just not an issue.

They recounted a study showing that the U.S. is above only Turkey (in the 32 countries polled — US, Japan, and 32 EU countries) in its’ unwillingness to accept the fact of evolution as scientific fact. The reasons they give for the national blindness are poor science education, a fiery political debate, and religious fundamentalism. “Republicans have clearly adopted this as one of their wedge issues. In most of the world, this is a non-issue.” according to Jon Miller of Michigan State who conducted the survey.

Miller’s report makes for grim reading for adherents of evolutionary theory. Even though the average American has more years of education than when Miller began his surveys 20 years ago, the percentage of people in the country who accept the idea of evolution has declined from 45 in 1985 to 40 in 2005 (Science, vol 313, p 765). That’s despite a series of widely publicized advances in genetics, including genetic sequencing, which shows strong overlap of the human genome with those of chimpanzees and mice. “We don’t seem to be going in the right direction,” Miller says.

Religious fundamentalists lead the fight against science. Fundamentalist Christians in numerous sects and cults fight against biology education because of a belief that the bible (the English, King James version, I assume) is literal. They have a belief that the world and humans were created 6000 years ago and no amount of physical evidence moves them from this idea. They maintain something called “intelligent design” where a practical-joking God sprinkles fossilized remains, geological strata and all the other millions of bits of evidence around just to test the faith of the faithful.

Miller thinks more genetics should be on the syllabus to reinforce the idea of evolution. American adults may be harder to reach: nearly two-thirds don’t agree that more than half of human genes are common to chimpanzees. How would these people respond when told that humans and chimps share 99 per cent of their genes?

However, the Internet has added a new armory of scholarly support to anyone willing to study the issue. An Internet site, Darwin On-Line has digitalized the largest existing collection of written materials, manuscripts, ancillary sources, and images on the great naturalist.

The home page lists the important collection and its’ offerings which include “…The first ever complete collection of all Darwin’s publications. Many have never been reproduced and almost all appear on line for the first time.” Texts are said to be complete and “as close to holding the book in one’s hand” as possible. Electronic and image forms of documents can even be viewed side-by-side.

There are, we saw above, some in America who would liken this collection of fascinating historical study or a glimpse of the works of the “great English naturalist and author of the Origin of species Charles Darwin (1809-1882)” to pornography and sacrilege. It is, however, a repository of knowledge in a field where emotion reigns often above any knowledge.

One site dedicated to explaining the science of evolutionary change quotes the eminent biologist, Douglas J. Futuyma in his book, Evolutionary Biology,

In the broadest sense, evolution is merely change, and so is all-pervasive; galaxies, languages, and political systems all evolve. Biological evolution … is change in the properties of populations of organisms that transcend the lifetime of a single individual. The ontogeny of an individual is not considered evolution; individual organisms do not evolve. The changes in populations that are considered evolutionary are those that are inheritable via the genetic material from one generation to the next. Biological evolution may be slight or substantial; it embraces everything from slight changes in the proportion of different alleles within a population (such as those determining blood types) to the successive alterations that led from the earliest protoorganism to snails, bees, giraffes, and dandelions.

Obviously the religious fundamentalists may not believe in planet-forming, star-birth, amoeba, dinosaurs, chimpanzees or the possibility of man evolving into a more reasonable creature, but, if they thought more about “bees, griaffes, and dandelions” the educational system might be less under attack in our country. As a scientist is reported to have said, the discussion of “evolution” is fruitless and merely being looked at from the wrong perspective. “When someone claims that they don’t believe in evolution they cannot be referring to an acceptable scientific definition of evolution because that would be denying something which is easy to demonstrate. It would be like saying that they don’t believe in gravity!”

Add to Technorati Favorites


Evolution Evolves Even In America


The New Scientist published an article on “Why Doesn’t America Believe In Evolution?” in the August 20 on-line issue.

It reports a study showing that the U.S. is above only Turkey (in the 32 countries polled — US, Japan, and 32 EU countries) in its’ unwillingness to accept the fact of evolution. The reasons they give for the national blindness are poor science education, a fiery political debate, and religious fundamentalism. “Republicans have clearly adopted this as one of their wedge issues. In most of the world, this is a non-issue.” according to Jon Miller of Michigan State who conducted the survey.

Miller’s report makes for grim reading for adherents of evolutionary theory. Even though the average American has more years of education than when Miller began his surveys 20 years ago, the percentage of people in the country who accept the idea of evolution has declined from 45 in 1985 to 40 in 2005 (Science, vol 313, p 765). That’s despite a series of widely publicized advances in genetics, including genetic sequencing, which shows strong overlap of the human genome with those of chimpanzees and mice. “We don’t seem to be going in the right direction,” Miller says.

Religious fundamentalists lead the fight against science. Fundamentalist, zealot Christians in numerous sects and cults fight against education about evolution because of a belief that the bible (the English, King James version, I assume) is literal. They have a belief that the world and humans were created 6000 years ago and no amount of evidence moves them from this idea. I think that in something called “intelligent design” a practical joking God sprinkles fossilized remains, geological strata and all the other millions of bits of evidence around just to test the faith of the faithful.

Miller thinks more genetics should be on the syllabus to reinforce the idea of evolution. American adults may be harder to reach: nearly two-thirds don’t agree that more than half of human genes are common to chimpanzees. How would these people respond when told that humans and chimps share 99 per cent of their genes?

However, the Internet has added a new armory of scholarly support to anyone willing to study the issue. An Internet site, Darwin On-Line has digitalized the largest existing collection of written materials, manuscripts, ancillary sources, and images on the great naturalist.

The home page lists the important collection (from the UK, of course) and its’ offerings:

The first ever complete collection of all Darwin’s publications. Many have never been reproduced and almost all appear on line for the first time.

Each text is absolutely complete, nothing is omitted (as so often with on line texts). The digitization on Darwin Online begin with the cover and include every page without exception, including end pages and publishers’ advertisements. It’s as close to holding the book in one’s hand as the Internet can be.

The site is fully searchable. Searches can be limited by name, date, title and so forth.

Both the fully formatted electronic text and images of the original document are provided. They can be viewed side-by-side.

Never before published transcriptions of some of Darwin’s handwritten manuscripts, such as the field notebook used on the Galapagos islands.

Darwin Online includes the most comprehensive bibliography of works written by Darwin ever published.

Darwin Online includes the largest catalogue of Darwin’s many handwritten manuscripts ever assembled.

There are, we saw above, some in America who would liken this collection of fascinating historical study or a glimpse of the works of the “great English naturalist and author of the Origin of species Charles Darwin (1809-1882)” to pornography and sacrilege. It is knowledge and a great undertaking for the Web which sometimes begins to seem as if it is being taken over by aliens from MySpace.

The House of the Witch

I am working on the Photoblog: “The Mayan World”. This picture, shot on near-infrared film, at the great ruin of Uxmal about an hour south of Merida on the Ruta Puuc is fitting to remind you and myself that I need to up-date and up-grade the Mayan pictures and stories. For now Halloween (not very important here) and The Day of the Dead, which decidedly is; are both coming soon. There are dead people to feed with thoughts and candied foods. It is a sweet ceremony not so unlike the Buddhist and we, as people, need to break bread with the dead now and again.

Add to Technorati Favorites


Obesity Epidemic Continues In USA

Following a conference in Boston recently, Yahoo has reported on the cost — that is, the financial costs — associated with the fact that 33.3% of the population is afflicted with the problem will hit over 90 Billion dollars per year. That’s a lot of fried pork rinds.

Among developed countries, the United States has the most obese and overweight people, representing 66 percent of its overall population.

Ovweweight people account for extra dollars in health care costs for the nation. Obese people for far more in costs and an obese person over 65 costs $2511 dollars more per year or over 9% more than a normally-sized person.

Skip the fast food joints and the “convenience foods”. There are ways to change and the cost of fat is far more than dollars. It includes heart disease, cancer, pulmonary problems, diabetes and just about everything else you can think of does not improve when you carry around all that weight. It is time to say no to Mc-this and Fried-that and that great drive-up window that overlooks the cemetery.

Absentee Ballots for Expatriates

We just received another reminder to register, request a ballot for the November election way back home and a chart/link to requirements and dates for each state.

The e-letter was from Howard Dean, Chairman of the Democratic Party. So?

If you are Republican, Libertarian, Socialist, Minutemen, Wiccas or anything else a free society allows; make sure you can and do vote.

If you have not yet requested a ballot, there may still be time to do that! Find your state’s deadline here:

The Federal government provides a handy back-up: the FWAB, or Federal Write-in Absentee Ballot. You can obtain your FWAB at http://www.VoteFromAbroad.org.

If your requested ballot has not arrived by October 24 - two weeks before Election Day - you can download a FWAB here:

If you have not yet requested a ballot, there may still be time to do that! Guidelines for each state and its’ deadlines can be accessed on the ‘Net.

Information from the Democratic Party for any party you want to vote for — it’s secret back home.

Beware of Caterpillars Bearing Hookahs

Reuters is such a great news-gathering entity and I rely on it so much that I am surprised to have to poke some fun at it. Just a little. The story sounds funny but, as I wrote it, I realized that it did describe a danger for some — just took itself a little too seriously but there are always slow news days which is about the same as having a “bad hair day” for a journalist.

There was little enough happening in the world that they wrote a piece with deep seriousness about the dangers of “… College kids starting a hookah habit”. Oh yes, there is a population who are worried that their children are going to be led into things worse than the sins of the pool room in River City. They are going to be again instantly dominated by the act of smoking like the Alice caterpillar and asking “Who are you?. Sometimes the hysteria of worry about addictions seems so much worse than the pleasure of the act and its’ addictive fervor. Who are you to travel with a hookah in your back-pack? A glass bowled hookah? A tall hookah? An expensive hookah?

I don’t even think that opium or other recreational drugs are being put into the latest American nightmare to keep middle-aged couples awake and hassled for the night. “My son is a caterpillar”, wails the suburban hausfrau. “All he does is sit on the leaf of a big plant and smoke his hookah. He even blows smoke-rings for little girls who visit”. Or so the suburban legend will begin.

They reported that a Dr. Christopher Loffredo, who is the director of the Cancer Genetics and epidemiology Prograw at Georgetwon Medical Center, is concerned over what he sees as an increasing use of hookah smoking of tobacco in Egyptian and American young people. Egypt began in 1997 for him where I am sure there is more acceptance, interest and modeling of hookah use by young people. Now he feels that he is noting an increase in hookah freaks among the American young.

Remember, you can’t publish rather than perish if you don’t do some studies to publish. Which is surely not to say that studies of human actions with all manner of substances is not called for. But hookahs? Try and find one here near the Belize border, Guatemala and Honduras. And they have all manner of tobacco types to stuff in their bowls.

Dr. Loffredo is right on a basic level when he says that we are already aware of the harm in cigarettes but that no one has put much effort into hookahs. “That kind of basic research really needs to be done so we have a better sense of what these health risks might be.” I assume the tobacco is cleaner and it might taste better filtered through a flavorful liquid. I also think that my old habits of chain-smoking provided far more chances for me to spend time with my cigarretes than I would have spent with my hookah (and once I remember having one).

At this mid-way point I planned to add the disclaimer that smoking anything — especially tobacco — is definitely, absolutely, provably, horribly, dangerously, intensely bad for you. There is no question. I am a living example of the ex-heavy smoker who suffered massive health problems partly from that addiction. There were genetic and other reasons but smoking was surely a factor.

I am also the proof of the addictive pudding. Twelve years after giving up cigarrettes — while sucking oxygen on an intensive treatment unit — I am still smoke-free and still alive. But twelve years after giving up the evil substance I still crave it. I still sometimes want to beat the wall in my need for a cigarrette which I once did try and found myself incapable of inhaling that beloved smoke. That proves to me that smoking tobacco is at least as addictive as heroin or any other so-called dangerous drug and probably more so. Remember the ghost-tobacco-freak in the movie Ghost? Sad stuff!

Therefore, just say no to tobacco in all its’ forms. Say “no” right off the bat because it is not as easy an addiction as heroin to quit and just as dangerous as the stuff made in fast food joints that will kill the next generation with yet another socially acceptable addiction.

Then I began to look into the new versions and importations of hookahs and Egyptian, flavored tobaccos that have appeared to appease this newish (ancient) entertainment. It is not the cheap, single hookah to be found in the “head shop” of yester-decade when I was smoking and visiting head shops from the East Village to San Francisco. Now the internet offers a tempting array of paraphanalia. Even I found a hookah quickly that I wanted (bang my head against the wall again!) just because it looked so pretty and probably tasted good. There might even be some chance that some people put something besides tobacco in the bowl. Really, such things are possible.

So, are there hookah parties? There were in the days of old, sitting in a foursome sucking smoke from tubes. There might be now. Is it so dangerous as the good Dr. Loffredo worried,

The concern is that the session of smoking is very long. There’s a social dimension to it. You’re sitting with friends, typically…” and the party time might be… three hours or more. That’s a lot of tobacco exposure in that time period.

True, but how much “tobacco exposure” did Humphrey Bogart manage running a bar on a French island? Or Edward R. Murrow while planning how to broadcast news the way news should be broadcast? Of course you must not forget that they suffered terribly for their addictions.

The good part is that I don’t totally believe Dr. Loffredo. I think hookah smoking is neither a long-term activity nor a long-lived fashion here in the West. The other good thing is that the objects are far prettier than a pack of “fags” as they were once known when rolled up into the short sleeve of your T-shirt when you weren’t wearing your black, leather jacket with the great zippers everywhere.

When I hit the trusty Google search button on my Firefox controls, the number of hookah sites and purveyors surprised me. Just looking at SouthSmoke.com they not only might sell you an intriguing conversation piece with one, two or four hoses and flavored tobacco but even the case I thought that hookah freaks wouldn’t have when they were running from the scene. They have them. Not only that but they publish “Hookah Etiquette” which is one of those Emily Post things I never learned.

When smoking with the Hookah, follow these guidelines to ensure a safe and enjoyable smoking experience.

Never light your cigarette using a Charcoal, as it is considered disrespectful in some countries.

When passing the Hookah around, make sure that the Hookah Hose is pointed in your direction, as it is more polite.

Please do not place your Hookah on top of a table because if the Hookah tips over, it becomes a fire hazard.

Never blow smoke in another persons face without their consent.

Never share your plastic mouthpiece with another person, as it does not promote good hygiene.

In order to indicate that you have finished using the Hookah, wrap the Hose around the Shaft.

Use the Tongs when igniting the Quicklighting Charcoals, as you risk getting severely burned if you use your hands.

Do not blow into the Hookah when other people are smoking the Hookah with you.

Only use Flavored Tobacco when smoking with the Hookah.

Do not place the Charcoals directly on the Flavored Tobacco, as the Tobacco is not suppose to be burned.

I would love to be young, stupid and immortal again. For those of you who think you are, please think again.


Digg!

Georgia’s Censorship of Bumperstickers

An RN from Emory University is fighting the $100 fine she was given in DeKalb County, Georgia for having a “lewd” anti-Bush bumper sticker on her car. The Georgia ACLU is helping to fight the case which is based on a law against obscene bumper stickers that was declared unconsititutional in 1990. It said, according to the CNN report, “I’m Tired Of All The Bush ***”.

I have always loved Georgia ever since Lester Maddox waved his hammer in defiance of law and morality and the state loved it.


Digg!